The comparison of two journals

Hello everyone came back in my blog "Yuvi Sri Widia", a long time no see, readers. Today i would like to compare reseach methodology and reaserach finding with the new journals that I have read. So, happy reading 👐

Learning English is a must to learn, but is not easy for Indonesian students because English and Indonesian are very different in terms of spelling, sounds and pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar. The students of English texts that they read. There are many factors causing the low reading ability of the students. It can be caused by a teacher and teaching technique used by the teacher. So to improve reading skills for students using a technique called DRTA (Direct Reading Thinking Activity), this strategy may still be unknown to many people, but this strategy is very good applied to improve reading skills the students. 

• Comparison reserach methodology and Finding Result.

 In new journals before I read the research design using the first 4 steps, Diagnosed Step, Second Panning Action, the Taking Action, and then the last Evaluating Action. The stages used are the same as the previous journals, because in implementing the DRTA strategy this stage is very important to do.

Results finding,

 The results findings in the second journal it only uses 2 reflection cycles, with a system of pre test and post test. DRTA used three stages, the first is predicting (Making predictions before reading like, previewing the title or seeing pictures), the second Reading (reading after predicting) and the last is proving / Disproving (re-revealing the results of predictions with the same reading or not )

 The results were found that the use of DRTA strategies was very effective in harmonizing reading skills with students. and then the lack is the absence of accurate data to strengthen statements such as graphs or charts that DRTA can improve students' abilities. 

I think is enough for today, thank you for visit :)